Why it is time to restate the case for the importance of research on animals

Pete Ryan

All of a sudden, governments have begun to talk about something that once seemed impossible: the end of animal testing. Last year, the US and the UK both unveiled road maps intended to help move us towards this goal. A few months ago, the European Commission did likewise. The coming of age of technological alternatives to some kinds of animal research is to be celebrated. A few of these alternatives are actually more revealing than the animal experiments they replace. But if nations overstate what is possible, they risk reigniting a heated and painful row.

We see this overstatement not only in news headlines, but even in the titles of policy documents themselves. Some of these talk of “phasing out” animal testing, when the truth is that animal testing cannot and will not be ended entirely.

Some scientists had their property set on fire. Molotov cocktails were used

There will always be a need for certain kinds of animal research to ask fundamental biological questions and ensure drug safety. This means that, while pursuing the reduction in animal tests as far as possible, we simultaneously need to be restating the case for why animal testing is so important.

To see what happens if we don’t, look back to the late 20th and early 21st centuries, when extreme animal rights activists violently harassed and intimated scientists. Some researchers had their property set on fire. Molotov cocktails were used. National newspapers reported on calls to murder those carrying out animal experiments.

If we send out the message that animal testing can be phased out, we risk painting the scientists who continue it as wilfully causing harm to animals. Such a misunderstanding could take us back to those dark and violent times, while prematurely abandoning the kinds of animal tests for which there are no reliable alternatives would risk our health and safety.

So let’s be clear-eyed. The push to reduce animal testing where safe and possible is truly welcome. But the end of animal testing as a whole remains impossible.

from Health – latest in science and technology | New Scientist https://ift.tt/W2mnuXy
via IFTTT

Xand van Tulleken on the 3 wellness trends to be most wary of

The wellness boom has brought a wide array of consumer products that promise to boost your health and happiness. Xand van Tulleken has delved into it all and explains how to think about the evidence behind the hype 

from Health – latest in science and technology | New Scientist https://ift.tt/E8zcHGU
via IFTTT

How better ways of screening drugs could soon lead to thousands fewer animal tests

Scientists can now get more accurate safety data by testing drugs on organ-on-a-chip devices and organoids, meaning that there’s increasingly less need to harm animals

from Health – latest in science and technology | New Scientist https://ift.tt/vyBYflS
via IFTTT

We may finally know what kick-starts muscle contractions in childbirth

An influx of immune cells into the uterus may be what initiates childbirth. These grab on to muscle cells via tiny tubes and send across mitochondria to provide energy for contractions

from Health – latest in science and technology | New Scientist https://ift.tt/zUAoh1k
via IFTTT

Bursts of ‘pink noise’ during sleep seem to help clear waste from brain

vibration sound. Resonance. Pulse. cardiogram
Pink noise might have health benefits
Veleri/Shutterstock

Sleeping while listening to bursts of pink noise – background sounds akin to gentle radio static – seems to boost the flow of fluid through the brain, and so might enhance the clearance of waste products that are linked to conditions like Alzheimer’s disease. The pink noise seems to bolster the slow brainwaves that enhance the pumping of blood vessels, which drives the brain’s waste-disposal system.

We already knew that listening to bursts of pink noise during sleep can strengthen slow brainwaves, a kind of electrical activity that occurs during certain phases of non-REM sleep, known as N3 (deep sleep) and N2 (the lighter stage before it). This effect occurs when the bursts coincide with the peaks of slow brainwaves.

“They really don’t sound like much, they’re just little staticky beeps,” says Joshua Levitt at Boston University in Massachusetts.

Prior research has also shown that boosting slow brainwaves – using drugs, for instance – can enhance the flow of the brain’s cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which bathes the brain and carries away waste products.

But it was unknown whether listening to pink noise has the same effect. That’s because measuring the brain’s CSF flow involves imaging it with MRI scans, but MRI interferes with EEG, the technique used to measure waves of electrical activity in the brain. One consequence of this interference is that slow waves recorded via EEG during MRI scans can’t be detected fast enough to align bursts of pink noise with their peaks.

“You have to do a lot of extensive processing of the EEG signals to detect slow brainwaves, so it’s hard to do that fast enough in real-time,” says Laura Lewis at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

To overcome this problem, Levitt, Lewis and their colleagues used EEG data collected during MRI scans from prior studies to train an AI model to rapidly predict when the brain’s slow waves will peak. “[The AI] says, ‘In about 70 milliseconds, a slow wave peak is coming,’ so now we should schedule our sound stimulation to arrive in accordance with that,” says Levitt.

“This, methodologically, really moves the field forward,” says Sephira Ryman at the University of New Mexico.

The researchers then recruited 27 healthy adults, aged 29 on average, to wear EEG electrodes on their scalp while taking an afternoon nap in an MRI scanner. Of these, 14 managed to fall asleep and enter N2 sleep. “It’s a difficult place to fall asleep,” says Lewis.

At the peak of half of each participant’s slow brainwaves, the researchers used the AI model to play 50-millisecond bursts of pink noise. During the remaining slow brainwaves, they played no noise as a control.

By analysing the MRI and EEG recordings, they found that bursts of pink noise strengthened the slow waves they coincided with and briefly boosted the flow of CSF into the brain, compared with no sonic stimulation. This suggests the pink noise also enhanced the flow of CSF through, and out of, the brain. “We know that the flow in is usually balanced with the flow that comes out,” says Lewis.

The increased CSF flow seemed to be driven by enhanced pumping of the brain’s blood vessels, which is known to push fluid through the brain’s waste-disposal system, called the glymphatic system.

Off the back of these results, the team is exploring whether the approach also works in older adults and whether it can boost the clearance of proteins, such as beta-amyloid, that are linked to conditions like Alzheimer’s disease. If the results are positive, the researchers hope to test whether the technique can slow cognitive decline in people during normal ageing, mild cognitive impairment – a condition that often precedes dementia – and the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease.

There is reason to think this could work. Exposing people to sounds and flickering lights – while they are awake – has previously shown promise at slowing cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer’s, potentially by boosting the glymphatic system.

But one benefit of the new approach is that it could eventually be delivered via a portable device while people are sleeping, which could be less disruptive, says Ryman.

Journal Reference:

Science Translational Medicine
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aed4290

from Health – latest in science and technology | New Scientist https://ift.tt/MG7cRL4
via IFTTT

Common painkiller use in early pregnancy linked to smaller ovaries and testes

Advice around painkiller use during pregnancy hasn’t changed off the back of this finding
Getty Images

Girls whose mothers took paracetamol (acetaminophen) during pregnancy had smaller ovaries at three months old, on average, than those whose mothers didn’t take the drug, according to a study of about 300 infant girls in Denmark. Infant boys whose mothers took paracetamol had smaller testes on average too, the study found.

That doesn’t prove paracetamol caused the reduction in the average size of ovaries and testes, though – this association could be a result of the conditions that led to the women taking paracetamol during pregnancy, or even due to chance alone. Nor is it clear whether having smaller ovaries or testes as an infant affects fertility in adulthood. However, the findings are in line with separate studies done in rats and mice, in isolated human ovaries and in human embryonic cells.

“We still recommend that pregnant women should use paracetamol with high fever or strong pain,” says Margit Bistrup Fischer at Copenhagen University Hospital–Rigshospitalet. Not doing so can be risky, she says.

But most of the women in the study used paracetamol for headaches or musculoskeletal pain, rather than fevers, and could have managed their pain or discomfort in other ways, such as via rest, heat treatment or physiotherapy, says Fischer.

“We should have a dialogue about when paracetamol is actually necessary,” she says. “It is still a drug and it does have side effects. Maybe it shouldn’t be the first thing that we grab when we have discomfort.”

The issue is that there are almost no safe drug-based alternatives to paracetamol for pregnant women. Most other painkillers aren’t recommended because they can cause congenital conditions.

Fischer’s team recruited 685 pregnant women during their first trimester, who were asked about their use of medicines every two weeks. They had an fetal ultrasound during their third trimester, and 302 daughters were examined around three months after birth.

Those exposed to paracetamol as a fetus had, on average, 40 per cent smaller ovaries by volume, 13 per cent smaller uteruses by volume and 23 per cent fewer ovarian follicles – the sacs that nurture immature eggs – compared with those who weren’t exposed. Higher doses were associated with a bigger effect, says Fischer, but no women took more than the recommended daily maximum of 4000 milligrams.

The researchers also analysed data from another study on 1210 girls born in Copenhagen between 1997 and 2002, and found a link between fetal exposure to paracetamol and smaller ovaries during adolescence.

In animal studies, such effects led to reduced fertility and earlier reproductive ageing, but it isn’t clear whether this applies to people. “We cannot say anything about the reproductive consequences for these girls,” says Fischer. That will require long-term follow-up, which is hard to do.

The team also examined the boys who were born to the 685 women. “We do see a difference, on average, in the boys as well,” says Fischer. “[They] have a reduced testicular volume.”

Animal studies suggest this could affect fertility in adulthood, but again it is still unclear if this will be the case for the boys. “We can’t say anything about that because our cohort does not follow them that long,” she says.

A paper describing the findings in girls was published today. A separate paper describing the findings in boys has been accepted by the same journal, but not yet published, says Fischer.

“It is still too early to sound the alarm, and to remove this tool from the therapeutic arsenal for treating pain and fever,” says Séverine Mazaud-Guittot at the National Institute of Health and Medical Research in France, who, in 2022, co-authored research showing that paracetamol impairs the development of isolated human ovaries.

But this latest study, along with one from last year showing that paracetamol affects the proliferation of human embryonic cells, suggest that the precautionary principle should be applied, especially during the first trimester, says Mazaud-Guittot.

“Raising awareness of alternative, non-pharmacological methods should help to encourage a reduction in the use of medication for the treatment of various mild pains,” she says.

“This paper would not change my practice or advice,” says Dimitrios Siassakos at University College London. The team carried out a number of different statical analyses, he says, and the more of these you do, the greater the odds of getting a statistically significant association by chance.

“I do agree that we cannot exclude the possibility of chance findings,” says Fischer. “[But] adjusting for multiple testing could mean that we fail to detect a real effect.”

Another issue is that people taking these medications could be sicker, including with one of the many infections that affect fetal development. They might also eat and behave differently, or vary genetically, says Brian Lee at the University of Pennsylvania. The team tried to take account of such confounding factors, but couldn’t completely rule them out.

“I would not jump to the conclusion that the statistical association observed is a causal association,” says Lee. He thinks there should be further studies into this, but establishing a causal link, if there is one, won’t be easy. A trial in which women were randomly assigned to take paracetamol or not would be the best way, but this would be unethical in pregnant women, says Fischer.

There have been claims that taking paracetamol during pregnancy increases the risk of autism, but the evidence suggests otherwise. “This in no way changes the conclusion that paracetamol is not linked to autism, as multiple studies featuring millions of pregnancies across Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Japan have shown,” says Lee.

Journal reference:

Human Reproduction Open
DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoag074

from Health – latest in science and technology | New Scientist https://ift.tt/1TnMbD5
via IFTTT

Laughter therapy may help people with chronic lung disease

A group practises laughter yoga
Laughter therapy has been linked to improvements in a variety of conditions
Nora Tam/South China Morning Post via Getty Images

People with chronic lung disease breathe better after two months of laughter therapy, results from a small trial show. The promising results may prompt further research into the low-cost treatment option.

In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) – a leading cause of disability and death worldwide – air isn’t fully expelled when exhaling, meaning stale air remains trapped inside the lungs. The millions of people who are affected by the condition often feel breathless, even during simple daily activities.

Doctors treat COPD with medications like bronchodilators and corticosteroids, and may also recommend specialised breathing exercises. These include pursed-lip breathing, in which patients breathe in through the nose and out slowly through the lips, which creates a gentle build-up of pressure that helps release some of the air trapped in the lungs. But many people with COPD continue to become increasingly dependent on others for care over time, reducing their quality of life.

Goncagul Aldan, formerly at Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing in Ankara, Turkey, had seen research showing that laughter therapy shows promise in people with diabetes, kidney failure and cancer and thought it might help those with COPD as well – both physically and mentally.

To find out, she and her colleagues recruited 63 people who were already being treated for COPD at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital and divided them into three groups of 21. In their randomised controlled trial, all participants continued their medications, but those in one group additionally performed pursed-lip breathing exercises and those in another group received laughter therapy. Participants in the third, control, group did neither.

The laughter therapy is an established programme that differs from simple responses to humour. It includes playful exercises like mimicking a motorcycle starting or a lion roaring, rhythmic clapping with vocal sounds and relaxation with calm breathing and smiling. The participants were coached by laughter therapists in face-to-face sessions and then instructed to perform the techniques on their own for 30 minutes, three times per week.

After eight weeks, participants in the laughter therapy and the pursed-lip breathing groups had less difficulty breathing and better overall health than those in the control group. Those benefits were still ongoing even a month after the trial ended, says Aldan. Even so, the therapies didn’t change how much daily assistance participants needed from caregivers. Aldan and her colleagues didn’t directly compare the effects of pursed-lip breathing and laughter therapy. They report the results today at the European Respiratory Society (ERS) Congress in Barcelona, Spain.

While more research could help clarify exactly how laughter therapy helps, Aldan suspects it might exercise the breathing muscles, promote deeper exhalation, improve lymphatic flow and trigger the release of endorphins, while also lowering levels of stress hormones.

“This structured approach may help facilitate gentle air expulsion and reduce air trapping without overwhelming the respiratory system,” she says. “Psychologically, it can also offer a safe, enjoyable way to reduce anxiety and support emotional wellbeing.”

Importantly, however, laughter therapy is distinct from intense or unguided laughter – like the response to a funny social media video – which can actually trigger adverse effects like acute airway collapse or exertion, says Aldan. “Laughter therapy is not merely ‘laughing’ – it is a structured protocol that naturally incorporates deep breathing exercises and rhythmic warm-ups to prepare the lungs and body for laughter.”

“This is a small but well-run study,” says Marc Miravitlles at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain, who wasn’t involved in the research. “These results – showing that patients can breathe more easily and feel better in general – are promising. Laughter therapy is simple and low-cost, meaning it could be used by anyone, anywhere in the world. We look forward to further research in this area.”

The team hopes to expand its work with international collaborators.

from Health – latest in science and technology | New Scientist https://ift.tt/w9sBYOy
via IFTTT

How worried should we be about the invasive mosquitoes in the UK? 

An Aedes aegypti mosquito
An Aedes aegypti mosquito
Shutterstock/SILVIA MAQQ

Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and larvae – which can transmit infections like dengue, chikungunya and Zika virus – have been found breeding in the UK.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) announced on 3 September that the species has been detected at residential properties in east London. This marks the fourth time it has been detected in the UK in recent years, and the first time it has been found breeding.

The mosquitoes are usually found in more tropical climates. So, is this a result of climate change? How concerned should we be? Here’s what you need to know.

What do we know about Aedes aegypti?

Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are native to North Africa, but can be found in tropical and temperate regions around the world, including parts of Europe. Although the species has been seen in the UK before, this is the first time these mosquitoes have been found breeding in the country.

The species can transmit many different pathogens, including dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya and Zika virus. It commonly feeds at dusk and dawn, and indoors and in shady areas.

Where were the mosquitoes found?

According to the UKHSA, the mosquitoes and larvae were found breeding in residential properties in East London. They were spotted and reported under the government’s Mosquito Watch scheme, which aims to detect the presence of invasive mosquitoes.

The UKHSA said the larvae have been destroyed and promised the area will be monitored closely to eradicate any further mosquitoes and larvae that might emerge.

What’s the threat to public health?

The UKHSA insists the threat to public health remains very low. There is no evidence the Aedes aegypti mosquitoes found in London have transmitted any infections to people, and so far there have not been any more mosquitoes or larvae being found in nearby public areas.

César López-Camacho at the University of Oxford said in a statement to the Science Media Centre that the discovery of their presence should be seen as an “early warning rather than an immediate public health threat”.

It is worth noting the UK is home to many species of native mosquitoes, but these generally don’t carry serious infections, and are largely an annoyance rather than a public health threat.

How did they get to the UK?

Jolyon Medlock at the UKHSA said in a statement that the mosquitoes were likely to be “accidental importations”, having “hitchhiked” in vehicles, suitcases or via imported plants.

Are these mosquitoes here to stay?

The UK has just had its hottest summer on record. London has seen some of the highest temperatures in the country, as heatwaves are usually amplified in cities due to the urban heat island affect.

That may mean the mosquitoes have been able to successfully breed over the summer months this year. But Medlock said the UK’s climate is still too cold overall to enable the mosquitoes to breed over the long-term – for now.

Is this a sign of climate change?

Mosquitoes are expanding their range north as the climate warms. Warmer weather also increases the rate at which viruses replicate in an insect’s body.

That means mosquito-borne viruses are rapidly becoming more common in Europe as the continent warms. In late August, French authorities reported cases of locally transmitted dengue, west Nile and chikungunya virus across the country, including Paris.

And a study published earlier this year found that the Asian tiger mosquito, another invasive mosquito species in Europe, can transmit chikungunya over several months of the year on the continent. The study authors said Europe’s rapid rate of warming was enabling virus transmission to become more widespread across the continent.

Over time, the threat of mosquito-borne disease to the British public is also expected to rise. Last year, West Nile virus was detected in the UK for the first time in mosquitoes in Nottinghamshire. For now, authorities hope to keep invasive mosquitoes out of the country for as long as possible to prevent disease transmission.

What should I do if I am stung by a mosquito?

For most people in the UK, a mosquito bite is an annoyance but nothing to worry about. It will usually produce a red, itchy swelling that will subside within a few days. If you develop a fever or become unwell, and have recently travelled to a location where dengue, chikungunya or Zika is circulating, you should seek medical attention.

How can I prevent mosquitoes breeding in my home?

Scientist say it is important to minimise the chance of mosquitoes breeding in the UK, to try to prevent invasive species gaining a foothold on UK shores. Aedes aegypti mosquitoes are well adapted to human environments and can breed in small quantities of standing water, so the most important action people can take is to eliminate, as far as possible, any standing water around the home. That could include emptying water trays under houseplants, clearing rainfall from containers, keeping lids on waterbutts, washing out pet bowls and flower vases regularly, and keeping shower areas as clean and dry as possible between use.

If you spot a mosquito in the UK, you can report it to the Mosquito Watch scheme.

from Health – latest in science and technology | New Scientist https://ift.tt/AO9iRn1
via IFTTT

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started